
| Back to Home Page | Back to Institute Activities |
The potential value of seasonal climate forecasts for use in agriculture depends on many factors, including those related to the agricultural enterprise and its sensitivity to climate variability, the type of forecast and its lead time and accuracy, and the ability and willingness of farmers and others to change their decisions in response to climate forecasts. Crop models are useful for translating predicted climate anomalies into estimates of crop yield anomalies and for estimating the value of forecasts. However, these models should be evaluated for local conditions to make sure they accurately simulate differences in production under the range of climate conditions anticipated in the study area.
For this exercise, a crop model will be used along with daily weather data provided on a CD and diskette, respectively. Instructions for installing the software and data are provided in an attached sheet (Attachment 1). The crop model is embedded in a user-friendly software package designed for use by farmers and their advisors. This package was developed by funding from the United Soybean Board in the US and is made available through the Internet by private agricultural supply and service companies in the soybean-producing states. An Abstract of this software is provided (Attachment 2).
In this exercise, we provide daily weather data for a number of years for a farming community in Southern Georgia (Tifton). Daily data from 1950 through 1998 were available for use. These yearly files of daily weather data were divided into 3 categories depending on rainfall during May, June, and July of each year: (1) years with rainfall amounts falling in the highest 1/3 of the cases, (2) years with rainfall falling in the middle 1/3, and (3) years with rainfall amounts falling in the lowest 1/3 of the cases. A fourth set of weather data were created by selecting at random from all of the available years of data. Ten years of data are available for each category (Wet, moderate, Dry, and All) on the diskette that is provided.
For this exercise, consider these daily weather data to be realizations of a climate prediction that is presented using terciles. The format would thus forecast that rainfall during the next 3 months will be in the lowest 1/3, middle 1/3 or highest 1/3 of the historical amounts. In the exercise, we assume that this forecast is perfect in the sense that the forecast correctly predicts the tercile to which the next 3 months of rainfall will belong. Thus, if the forecast is for rain to be in the lowest tercile, the 10 years of "Dry" weather data can be used as different possible realizations of this forecast.
We will use soybean as an example crop, and we will compute the expected yield using daily weather data for each tercile as well as for the randomly selected years. In addition, the distribution of yields can be estimated from the 10 years of results that are simulated, for each category. This step will provide an estimate of the differences in yield one might expect for different (perfect) tercile forecasts, using the same management practices for each case. These results will clearly show differences in expected yields for each case, but they will not provide any information about the value of forecast information to the farmer. In other words, in this case the farmer always uses the same management practices without considering climate predictions. Changes in yield can not be attributed to the use of climate predictions. Changes in management must be investigated to determine if there is potential value to the farmer by conditioning management practices to climate predictions.
Now that you know how to operate PCYield, you can investigate the possibility for increasing yields for each set of weather files by changes in management. Only two management variables can be changed with this simple interface: variety and planting date. Here, we will attempt to do this for the Dry case first. Copy the lowest tercile weather data from the A:\Dry directory into the C:\Program Files\PCYield\MyFarm directory. Make several runs, one after the other, each with different combinations of planting date and variety. You should not use a planting date earlier than April first nor later than July 1. And, you should consider only varieties from Maturity Groups 4-8. Record the results nad which variety and planting date that you use in each case.
Repeat this process using the randomly selected years. Compare results for these two cases. If you have time, repeat the process for the highest and middle terciles (using weather data from the Wet and Mod directories on A:\, respectively.
Be ready to discuss these results and compare them with what others find.
Installation of PCYield
[ Return to top of page | Back to Institute Activities | Back to Home Page ]
Page Last Updated: September 9, 1999 Contact Information: Guillermo Podestá, Institute Science Coordinator e-mail: gpodesta@rsmas.miami.edu Telephone: 1.305.361.4142 FAX: 1.305.361.4622